Sort your sites out!

I read a lot of blog posts in my RSS reader of choice —NetNewsWire— but for those I want to revisit I tend to open the post directly in Safari so I can go back to it later. Yes, I KNOW, there are a myriad of ‘read later’ apps available.

The trouble is that some websites are just not good as an experience. One I’ve visited twice now has confused me both times, as it has large bars down the side of the window that mark a paragraph, with each paragraph having a bar on a different side of the screen, it’s like badly formatted block quotes or something.

That said, there is a common theme of minor peeves that I stumbled across on many websites which are, in no particular order:

  1. Comments are good, add them. Yes, I know it opens up things like spam but if you are posting to spark a conversation then why not have them? (and if you aren’t open to conversation, in public, don’t post??).
  2. Using all lowercase text is bad for readability (and looks like you didn’t learn how to write properly).
  3. Layout is important, make your content the focus (see that weird non-block quotes layout I mentioned before)
  4. Tiny default text = bad.
  5. Too much clutter on the page = bad.

I’m being trite, and glib, and I know a lot of this can be subjective.

I have no excuse for this grumpy post. Sure, it’s been a long day —my own fault, getting up at 4:30am to go for a walk— but browsing some sites on my lunch and all of these things hit me in the space of about 20 mins, it’s madness!! Don’t you want people to read what you wrote? Why are you making that experience not nice?

Whilst I am not willing to die on these hills, I mean it’s only blogging, they do irk me so.

And no, I will not name names so don’t ask (in public).

Similar musings from the archive


You can reply by email, or leave a comment below.

9 responses to “Sort your sites out!”

  1. Thought of another one – posts that are one line. View them on a website and they get lost amongst the navigation, comment box (presuming there is one), and all the links and noise that good sites have!

  2. It irks me when a site leans too-heavily on JavaScript. Like: HTML gave us a way to add images; why did {some site} take it, throw it away, then replace it with a worse version powered by a ton of JavaScript that may or may not work properly? Just use HTML!

  3. I admit that I am at the behest of WordPress as I’m a long time away from hand coding my site, but there does seem to be a fair bit of cruft code on my site which I also don’t like.

  4. And another with no comments and no obvious way to contact the author to point out they’ve misspelled my surname…

    https://social.emucafe.org/naferrell/pook-emu-bee-links-for-05-28-26/

  5. I agree with almost all of your points however publishing a personal website is an expression of a person’s personality. They are perfectly within their rights to make their website as annoying as they want.

    On my site I decided to strive for clarity in both the text and presentation (to varying success) but other people may have other priorities. The web in general needs more idiosyncratic personal sites.

    That said, if a site is too annoying I probably won’t be back. And I will never, ever subscribe to a newsletter that announces itself in a widget that slides over the text – sites should definitely stop doing that.

  6. Hi Andrew, I completely agree that people’s personal websites should be whatever THEY want. We need more expressions of individuality for sure!

    I’m not suggesting otherwise, nor trying to arbitrate for my way of thinking. These were just some recurring things I’ve been noticing that, for me, don’t make sense. Each to their own though and the web is better for it!

  7. […] reply to my Sort your sites out note Case Duckworth takes each of my points and gives them a good […]

  8. Re; https://www.gordonmclean.co.uk/2026/05/28/sort-your-sites-out/#comment-9209

    I published the article you linked in your comment. I apologize for misspelling your name (no idea why I read an extra C in there). I fixed the error and added an easier-to-find Contact link to the site header based on your note.

    Correction aside, I enjoyed your blog post. I largely agree with points 2-5 but like you I read many articles and posts using my feed reader (as well as Wallabag), so I often avoid independent formatting choices. I differe on comments for two reasons. First is spam — I have comments enabled on one page on my main site and the amount of spam makes me shudder at the thought of enabling them broadly. Secondly, I prefer email or site-to-site conversations to comments.

  9. Not the first, nor the last, to misspell my name 😊

    And yes, I think comments are the most contentious point. I don’t seem to suffer too badly from spam but if I did that would be the main reason I’d look for an alternative.

What are your thoughts?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.